image

Critiques, Reviews & Professional Analyses of Babywise and Preparation for Parenting

Medical Concerns

AAP Media Alert | PDF version
American Academy of Pediatrics Statement on Parent Directed Feeding Schedules

Examining the Evidence for Cue Feeding (PDF file)
by Jan Barger, RN, MS, IBCLC and Lisa Marasco, MA, IBCLC

Getting Wise to Babies (PDF file, 2004)
by Dr. Ian Harrison, MB, BS, FRANZCP (Fellow of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists)

Conflicting Messages--A Review of Babywise 2001 | Printer-friendly version
by Kathy Thile

What to Make of Babywise -- (PDF file)
Childbirth Instructor Journal, Nov/Dec 1999, Patty Donohue-Carey, BS, LCCE, CLE

BabyWise? BeWary! Who is Gary Ezzo and why... (PDF file)
Tulsa Kids, part one, by Cindy Webb, B.S.

BabyWise? BeWary! What Ezzo Doesn't Know About Child Development... (PDF file)
Tulsa Kids, part two, by Cindy Webb, B.S.

Scheduled Feedings
Diane Wiessinger, MS, IBCLC, explains how babies' feedings fit into real life

Parenting Experiment
by Mary Ann Griffin, RN, CNM and Jan Barger, RN, MA, IBCLC

Thirty-five unsubstantiated and/or false medical statements in Babywise '95
by Matthew Aney, M.D.

Religious Parenting Programs: Their Relationship to Child Abuse Prevention
The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Orange County
Parenting Program Committee Report, Preparation for Parenting portion, May 14 1996

Problems with the 45-minute intruder portions of the 2001 Babywise
by Laurie Moody, lactation counselor and former GFI volunteer "contact mom"

Sheila Kitzinger's Letter from Europe: Boot Camps for Babies
BIRTH: Issues in Perinatal Care, March 2006

Whats the Fuss over Babywise and Preparation for Parenting?
by Tyler Horner, Ph. D.

Analysis of GFI's information on co-sleeping and SIDS
from 1997, an analysis of a then-current GFI article may still be useful

Babywise--Not So Wise
by Moire Porter, article first appeared in The Early Childhood Educator, Winter 2001

Dangers of "Crying it Out"
by Darcia Narvaez, Ph.D., professor of psychology at University of Notre Dame, writing in Psychology Today, Dec 2011 (This is an indirect critique that amasses research-based information about crying in babies from a secular perspective.)

Theological Concerns

More than a Parenting Ministry
by Kathleen Terner and Elliot Miller, Christian Research Journal

The Ethics of Ezzo
by Tony Payne, Matthias Media (despite the title, the article is about how Ezzo uses the Bible in his presentation.)

An Evaluation of Ezzo Parenting Programs  | PDF file
by Dr. Kent McClain

On Becoming Childwise: A Critique
by Laurie Moody

Growing Kids the Ezzo Way
by Dr. Philip Ryken, 10th Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia

Growing Kids God's Way -- Not Ezzo's
Clarifications
On the Cultic Mindset, Ezzoism, and Sleeping Through the Night
by Dr. Bob Bixby, Morningstar Baptist Church

A Critique of Growing Kids God's Way
Biblical Discernment Ministries

Religious Parenting Programs: Their Relationship to Child Abuse Prevention
The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Orange County
Parenting Program Committee Report, theological section May 14 1996

Letter to the Elders about Preparation for Parenting Class
Steve Rein's letter to his church elders after attending this class

Mothering in the Shadow of the Cross
by Rebecca Prewett

Scheduling, Routine, Flexibility, and Responsiveness: Muddling through the Maze of Conflicting Baby Advice
by Rebecca Prewett

Woman to Woman
by Helen Aardsma

Whose Way, After All?
by Barbara Curtis

Unto the Least of These
booklet by Rebecca Lewis

Preparation for Behavioral Pediatrics
by Rebecca Prewett

Some Concerns about the Ezzo Method
by Rebecca Prewett

In Response
by Rebecca Prewett (responds to Ezzo's rebuttal of above article--unfortunately no longer available on-line)

Strict Parenting Schedules
from the Couple to Couple league

Neo-Evangelizing the Catholic Parent with an Alien Gospel
by Dr. Thomas and Jacintha Mezzetti
(Protestant parents may find much of value in this critique as well.)

Parenting Experiment

by Mary Ann Griffin, RN, CNM and Jan Barger, RN, MA, IBCLC

reprinted by permission of The Compleat Mother

Intrigued by the claims in Babywise?  Being encouraged to take a Preparation for Parenting Course?  Given the books/tapes by someone who has "perfect" children?  Before you leap, take a few days to try an experiment to help you decide if this is the best way for you to parent your newborn.

Both mom & dad must do this:

Days 1 and 2:

Each time you put something in your mouth, write it down.  Note the time, what it was, and how much.  When you eat a meal, note how long it took you to eat. Don't forget to document every drink of water, piece of candy, donut, cup of coffee, snack and meal.  At the end of day two, add up the number of times you put something in your mouth.  Also add up how long it took you to consume a meal, a leisurely cup of coffee, a quick drink of water, and divide by the number of times you put something in your mouth to get an average.

Now you have an idea of how much time you spend eating, how often you have something in your mouth, and how much food you consume.

Days 3, 4, 5:

This part of the experiment is best done over a long weekend, as it requires three days.  This is not too much time to devote to understanding an experience your child will endure for several months.  You should be able to get to Sunday services, if you come late and leave early.

1.  The experiment requires two parents; one to the be "caregiver" and one to be the "baby."  Pregnant women or persons with health problems should not be the "baby."  Ideally, both parents should try this experiment before pregnancy so they can decide if they really want to even HAVE a baby.

2.  The "baby" will be fed at six hour intervals only, three times a day.   All clocks, watches, or other timepieces must be removed from the "baby's" view so he has no way of knowing when the six hours has elapsed.  This is longer than is recommended in Babywise and Prep, but as an adult with adult metabolism, the "baby" should have the ability to wait six hours during the day and to fast overnight.   The "baby" may have one other drink of water before he goes to bed, but otherwise, no liquid is to be consumed outside of these three mealtimes.  Mealtimes are to be limited to 10 minutes.   Baby must try to eat and drink everything put in front of him because at the end of 10 minutes, the plate must be removed.  The "baby" must eat the food with the non-dominant hand using only a spoon. A newborn may have trouble with latching on, early breastfeeding, and getting enough milk in timed feedings. NOTHING is to interfere with this schedule — not the baby's perceived wants, nor anything you believe you have to do.  The schedule must be adhered to at all times.

3.  The "caregiver" may not speak to the "baby" in any language that the "baby" is fluent in.  The caregiver can speak in an unknown tongue, or use sounds and touches to communicate.  No sign language.  The "baby" may not speak for the entire three days.  The only way the "baby" can communicate with the caregiver is by tapping a pencil.  The "baby" can attempt to signal the caregiver by varying the tapping, but is not allowed to write, point, or gesture.  Be careful not to break or drop the pencil as you only get one.

4.  The "caregiver" should go about the usual daily activities in the house during the day.  Time will be needed to prepare the food, "walk" the baby from place to place, provide clothing (baby can dress himself — too hard with an adult) and can take the "baby" to the bathroom (once every three hours during the day).  For a period of time after each meal, the caregiver can play with the "baby."  Otherwise, the "baby" must wait where the caregiver has placed him and in about the same position.  In addition, the caregiver must devote some time each day to a significant other person through letter writing or phone conversation.  This time must not be interrupted by the "baby's" needs. The "baby" needs to understand that the caregiver's relationship to something or someone else is often more important than him.  If the "baby" gets uncomfortable, he can tap his pencil and hope that the caregiver will be able to figure out the problem.  If the "baby" gets hungry, he can tap the pencil.

Hunger pain, no matter how severe, and thirst are considered normal.  In order to help the "baby" understand that he is not the center of the universe, any food or drink must be postponed until the next scheduled meal.

5.   For at least 3/4 hours twice a day, the "baby" must be put in his room with the door shut.  This "roomtime" will offer a structured learning center which will develop mental focusing skills, create a sustained attention span, give the "baby" the opportunity to entertain himself (no TV or books allowed), and create orderliness.

5.  The "baby" should be put to bed in a separate room from the caregiver shortly after the last drink of water.  The "baby" should tap the pencil if he has any nighttime needs, but he may not be fed or taken out of bed. Loneliness at night is a normal part of the experience  Under no circumstances may baby be brought to bed with you, as this may be considered "passively abusive emotionally."  You can use a baby monitor to hear the tapping, but if you can't sleep through the tapping, just turn off the monitor.  After all, you need your sleep so that you will have plenty of energy for the next day's activities.  It would be wise to take the "baby" to the bathroom before bed so there won't be any accidents.

7.  Do not be tempted to end the experiment before the three days are up. This will be considered a failure and may have long lasting implications.  If you find the process contrary to your instincts, try to control yourself. Above all, do not let anyone outside the system, baby expert or not, try to talk you out of continuing.  After all, you are only doing what is "right" and best for you and your "baby."

8.  If the "baby" should have any profound personal or spiritual insights during the time of the experiment, he should be sure to remember them.  He can write them down at the end of the three days.  (That is, if there is any pencil left.)

One last thought.  Presumably, the two of you discussed the experiment before you started so that the "baby" understood what was going to happen. Your newborn will not have the luxury of understanding the process.

Good luck!

Unsubstantiated Medical Statements in Babywise '95

Note: This paper was based on the edition of Babywise that was being sold at the time of writing, the one with a copyright date of 1995. This edition is still passed around to friends and neighbors, sold on Ebay, etc. Later editions may have inherited some of these unsubstantiated statements.

According to Dr. Matthew Aney, there are at least thirty five unsubstantiated and/or false medical statements in Babywise '95:

Unsubstantiated Medical Statements

There are numerous medical statements made throughout `Babywise' without any references or research backing it up, many of these are the antithesis of well known medical research, even though Dr. Bucknam claims that Babywise contains "medically sound principles" (p. 14). A few of these examples by Mr. Ezzo and Dr. Bucknam follow. Some of the statements contain the names of fictional examples, Chelsea - a parent directed fed baby, and Marissa - a demand-fed baby.

    • "Attachment parenting theories are not well grounded on an impeccable body of evidence" (p. 38). [2001: "attachment parenting theory...is driven by an interesting but unproven philosophical assumption--birth trauma." The paragraph equivocates by adding that "theories of attachment" are actually the "generally accepted truth that infants are born with the capacity and need for warm, loving, and intimate relationships. When these relationships are secured from loving parents, the foundation for all future emotional bonds is established."(p 32, 2001)]
    • "Lack of regularity sends a negative signal to the baby's body, creating metabolic confusion that negatively affects his or her hunger, digestive, and sleep/wake cycles" (p. 43). "Parent-directed feeding provides necessary guidance. It establishes for baby a rhythmic structure which helps hunger cycles synchronize with planned wake and sleep times....In contrast, erratic feeding periods confuse an infant's young memory....there is no chance for the hunger/wake/sleep mechanism to stabilize. Baby is confused, uncomfortable, perhaps insecure. This absence of routine for baby typically breeds unhealthy sleep patterns."
    • "Medical authorities know that when you deal with life-and-death situations, babies thrive better when fed on routine as compared to nonroutine feedings" (p. 44).
    • "A breast feeding mom is more likely to be successful with a daily infant plan than with random feeding periods" (p. 44). [2001: "Chelsea's mom feels healthier as a result of her established feeding routine." (p. 44, 2001)]
    • "Chelsea's digestive system will have fewer problems with colic-like symptoms when compared with her demand-fed cousin" (p. 45).
    • "Between the third and eighth week, her [Chelsea's] mom can expect her to begin sleeping seven to eight hours straight through the night. Chelsea will probably sleep ten to twelve hours per night by week twelve" (p. 45).
    • "Learning disorders associated with nonstructured styles of parenting-including deficiencies in sitting, focusing, and concentrating-are minimized with routine" (p. 46).
    • "Mothers who are constantly attentive by way of baby slings, shared sleep, and demand feeding, all in hopes of fostering security, too often accomplish the opposite" (p. 46).
    • "Marissa's mom tends to be "strung out" emotionally. . . in a sense is in bondage to her daughter's unpredictability. . . many moms whofeed their babies on demand are so tired that they prematurely give upbreast-feeding. . . Marissa's mom nurses her baby so often that sometimes her let-down is delayed, frustrating her child. Or worse yet, her let-down may not occur at all. . .Marissa's mom had a terrible bout with postpartum depression. Her condition is not unusual for mothers whose bodies are worn out from the absence of structure. . .Chelsea's mom and the other mothers who follow PDF have less maternal anxiety thanmothers who choose to demand-feed" (pp. 46-47).
    • "Demand-fed babies don't sleep through the night" (p. 52).
    • "Healthy, full-term newborns have a predisposition for continuous nighttime sleep by the eighth week. Newborn sleep cycles do not stabilize until hunger and digestive patterns are stabilized. Routine parental interaction helps stabilize hunger patterns. Inconsistent parental interaction fosters irregular hunger patterns, thereby creating instability in the child's sleep/wake cycles" (p. 53).
    • "Babies know when they are hungry, but they are not capable of regulating their hunger patterns. And yes, babies know when they are tired, but they are not capable of establishing stable sleep/wake cycles on their own. Parental guidance is necessary" (p. 54). [page 47 in Babywise 2001]
  • "Erratic feeding periods confuse an infant's young memory. Since the parental response changes from day to day, often hour to hour, there is no chance for the hunger mechanism to stabilize. With the way Marissa is being fed, any programmed stability will be a matter of chance. That's why Marissa will probably take two years before she sleeps through the night, and why she is a candidate for sleep-related problems in childhood" (p. 55).
  • "Whether feeding is accomplished by a bottle or the breast is not as important as the gentle and tender cuddling you give him during feeding" (p. 63).
  • "A mother who takes her baby to her breast twelve, fifteen, or twenty times a day will not produce any more milk than the mom who takes her baby to breast six to seven times a day" (p. 65). [reiterated in Babywise 2001 using 12/15/20 contrasted to 8/9 p 67]
  • "Too many snack feedings (with too little time between feedings) may reduce proper stimulation; too few feedings (too much time between feedings) reduces milk production" (p. 66). [reiterated p 68]
  • "Consistently feeding sooner than two and one-half hours can wear Mom down, causing a decrease in milk production" (p. 67). [reiterated using 1.5 to 2 hours--p 74]
  • "Mothers following PDF have little or no problem with the let down reflex, compared to those who demand-feed" (p. 68).
  • "Demand-fed babies tend to snack all day. PDF babies have a complete meal at each feeding. The child who nurses frequently and takes in fewer ounces of milk will naturally be hungry more often. In contrast, the child on PDF takes in more ounces of milk at a feeding, thereby causing the digestive and absorption processes to take longer" (p. 69).[reworded: Breast milk is digested faster than formula, but that doesn't justify unlimited breast-feedings to try and play catch-up. Rather than comparing breast milk to formula, it's more useful to look at the amount of breast milk consumed at each feeding. The AP style of demand-feeding does not distinguish between snack time and mealtime. For these mothers, a feeding is a feeding. The child who nurses frequently and takes in fewer ounces, especially of foremilk, will naturally be hungry more often. PDF moms look to deliver full meals at each feeding.--p70]
  • "Between nine and twelve months, the nutritional value of breast milk drops and food supplements are usually needed" (p. 73). [p. 79]
  • "Formulas these days have properties closely matched to those of breastmilk, including the proper balance and quantity of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates" (p. 76). [p. 82]
  • "The average number of feedings in a twenty-four-hour period [for a newborn to eight week old] will be seven to eight before your baby is sleeping through the night, and six to eight feedings afterwards. Although you will be dropping the nighttime feeding at this point, you will not be reducing your baby's caloric intake, just rearranging the time of intake" (p. 102).
  • "There are some little ones whose internal clocks get "stuck" at the nighttime feeding. Parental guidance can help reset that clock. If you have a digital timepiece and notice that your baby is waking at nearly the same time each night, that's a strong indicator that his or her biological clock is stuck. To correct the problem, wait for a weekend when no one has to get up early for work. (You may want to sleep in if your sleep is disturbed by your baby's crying during the night .) When your baby awakens, don't rush right in to him or her. Any crying will be temporary, lasting from five to forty-five minutes. Remember, this will be temporary! Some parents fear that failing to respond right away will make their baby feel unloved or insecure. On the contrary, it's cruel not to help your child gain the skill of sleeping through the night. Taking the baby into bed with you will delay the learning process" (p. 112). [Mostly reiterated in Babywise 2001 p 124]
  • "There may be a brief period of fussing or crying when you put the baby down for a nap. Don't be deterred from doing what is best for the child. Crying isn't the terrible beast that some of the last generation of medical practitioners thought it was. Some crying is a normal part of a baby's day and some babies will cry a few minutes in the process of settling themselves to sleep. The future trade-off will be a baby who goes down for a nap without fussing and wakes up cooing. Crying for 15-20 or even 30 minutes is not going to hurt your baby physically or emotionally. Your baby will not lose brain cells, experience a drop in IQ, or have feelings of rejection that will leave waking hours with a few minutes of crying. On the other hand, if you want a fussy baby, never let him cry, and hold, rock, and feed him as soon as he starts to fuss. We guarantee you will achieve your goal" (p. 118-119).
    "Seventy percent of PDF babies drop the middle-of-the-night feeding on their own. The remaining thirty percent need a little nudge. This may involve some crying, which might continue for as little as five minutes or last as long as one hour, off and on. It usually takes three days to establish unbroken sleep cycles at this age" (p. 120).
  • "Immediate-gratification training negatively impacts a child's ability to learn the skills of sitting, focusing, and concentrating" (p. 128). ["Research has clearly demonstrated that immediate-gratification training negatively impacts a child's ability to learn, affecting the skills of sitting, focusing, and concentrating." p.141]
  • "It is commonly observed that babies under the parent-directed-feeding plan tend to cry less in the long run than babies who are demand-fed"(p. 129). ["Babies under the parent-directed feeding plan tend to cry less in the long run than babies who are demand fed." -p 141]
  • "With demand-fed babies, cries are unpredictable, leaving mom and dad guessing and anxious" (p. 130).
  • "Because Marissa is not on a routine, she is much more likely to be a fussy baby" (p. 135). ["Since Marisa lacks routine in her life, she is much more likely to be considered a fussy baby." p. 149]
  • "Colic, which basically is a spasm in the baby's intestinal tract that causes pain, is very rare in PDF babies but is intensified in demand-fed babies" (p. 135). [Changed to: "There is much disagreement as to the true origin of this overused condition. In Dr. Bucknam's medical practice and in testimonies from hundreds of former demand-feeding mothers, bouts of colic-like symptoms are substantially reduced with PDF. The last thing you should put into an irritated stomach is food.....If your child does suffer from colic, the best thing you can do is to keep that child on a routine. This allows his or her stomach to rest between feedings".--p. 149-150]
  • "Although some women find themselves depressed and weepy several days after giving birth, not all women experience postpartum depression. Many who do have certain traits in common-they're not on a routine, they nurse frequently, and they are up several times during the night--all of which leave them in a perpetual state of exhaustion. Each of these symptoms can be traced back to the strain that lack of routine puts on a mother" (p. 156). [p. 186]
  • "If you use a sling, do so thoughtfully. In our opinion, much more developmental damage is done to a child by holding him or her constantly than by putting the baby down. . . In terms of biomechanics alone, carrying a baby in a sling can increase neck and back problems, or even create them" (p. 159-160). [ "In terms of biomechanics alone, carrying a baby in a sling may increase neck and back problems, or even create them"--p190]
  • "Some researchers suggest that putting a baby on his or her back for sleep, rather than on the baby's tummy, will reduce the chance of crib death. That research is not conclusive, and the method of gathering supportive data is questionable" (p. 166). [Changed to: Today research strongly suggests and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that putting a baby on his or her back for sleep, rather than on the baby's tummy, reduces the risk of SIDS. What is not conclusive is whether back sleeping is the primary or secondary factor in the reduction of risk. Does the supine position (wholly on the back) remove the child from soft surfaces and gas-trapping objects(mattresses, pillows, crib liners), which could be the actual risk facto, or is ti actaully the biomechanics of tummy-sleeping? MOre research is need to answer that question. Meanwhile, we suggest you speak to your health care provider if you have any questions concerning SIDS and the positioning of your baby. Parents ask us if back positioning will interfere with the establishment of healthy sleep. The answer is no."--p 196]
  • In a question and answer section:

    Question: "My two-week old daughternurses on one side, then falls asleep. Two hours later, she wants to eat again. What should I do?

    Answer: You need to keep your baby awakeduring feeding time. . . Babies learn very quickly from the laws of natural consequences. If your daughter doesn't eat at one feeding, then make her wait until the next one. That will probably only happen once. Don't feed her between routine mealtimes; otherwise, you are teaching her to snack, not eat" (p. 180).[Reworded and changed to:

    If she is hungry, feed her, but work on keeping your baby awake to take a full feeding from both breasts. Here are some ideas: Change her diaper between sides; undress her; rub her head or feet with a cool, damp washcloth. Do what you must to keep her awake. Then finish the task at hand. Baby must eat. If you allow baby to snack, she won't argue with that. Babies learn very quickly to become snackers if you let them. If your baby increasingly becomes characterized by snacking, you must work on stretching the times between feedings to make the 2 1/2 hour minimum. p 175]

  • Again, in a question and answer section:

    Question: "My baby is eight weeks old and has not yet slept through the night. What should I do to eliminate the middle-of-the-night feeding?

    Answer: If he is waking every night at basically the same time, then he is waking out of nighttime habit and not out of need. If that's the case, you may need to help him eliminate the feeding period by not physically attending to him. Normally it takes three nights of some crying before the habit is broken. He will never remember those three nights, nor will they have any negative effects on him" (p. 182). [Reworded on page 178, example changed to 10 week old baby, other options listed, and the statement "nor will they have any negative effects on him" has been changed tot, "Helping baby learn this behavior has positive long-term benefits on you both."]

  • Professionals Say
  • Signs of Hunger
  • Recent Research
  • A Mom Says

Rosemary Shy, MD , FAAP
Director, Children's Choice of Michigan Ambulatory Pediatrics
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Mich

"It is dangerous to do it the way he describes," Pediatrician Dr. Rosemary Shy says of Ezzo's technique. "It puts these babies at risk for jaundice, at risk for dehydration, and at risk for failing to thrive, all of which we’ve seen." -- Wilson, Steve, "Baby Care Controversy," WXYZ-Detroit, November 14, 2004

 

Arnold Tanis, MD, FAAP
1999 recipient, John H. Whitcomb Outstanding Pediatrician Award, presented by the Florida Pediatric Society and the Florida Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

"There is no scientific basis whatsoever in their philosophy....It is contrary to what nature intended.

Read More

Watch Your Baby's Signs of Hunger

Although Babywise says to feed a hungry baby, it usually instructs parents to observe a time interval between feedings, or a certain order of events, such as only feeding the baby after she wakes up. There's another way to tell that your baby is hungry. You can watch your baby for her own signs of hunger.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends watching for the following early signs or cues by which your baby lets you know when she's hungry.

  • Small movements as she starts to awaken
  • Whimpering or lip-smacking
  • Pulling up arms or legs toward her middle
  • Stretching or yawning
  • Waking and looking alert
  • Putting hands toward her mouth
  • Making sucking motions
  • Moving
Read More

Maternal use of parent led routines associated with short breastfeeding duration.

Published Feb 12, 2014
Brown A, Arnott B (2014) Breastfeeding Duration and Early Parenting Behaviour: The Importance of an Infant-Led, Responsive Style. PLoS ONE 9(2): e83893. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083893

"Results: Formula use at birth or short breastfeeding duration were significantly associated with low levels of nurturance, high levels of reported anxiety and increased maternal use of Parent-led routines . Conversely an infant-led approach characterised by responding to and following infant cues was associated with longer breastfeeding duration."

Raising Emotionally Healthy Children - 2014 Video

This KET Special Report looks at the importance of social and emotional development in the first years of life, featuring experts on infant and child development in Kentucky.

Read More
Our first child was born in the summer of 09, and I promptly began trying to apply the Babywise method. The book had been highly recommended by a distant relative, and promised structure and sanity amidst the exhaustion and upheaval I felt as a new mother. However, our baby did not respond the way the book promised he would if we followed the schedule. All my attempts to adhere to the book led to deep frustration, arguments with my husband (who knew better than to let a book dictate our newborn's schedule), feeling like a failure, and the worst--resentment of my infant. Why couldn't he sleep and eat like the book said he should be doing? The Ezzos presented their arguments as infallible.
Read More
Babywise and Preparation for Parenting

Free downloadable parent education brochure

research-based answers
print and share with your pediatrician
leave some with your health department
Give one to your pastor or Christian ed department

Download Now

Key Documentation

LIVING HOPE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP:
Excommunication Statement

GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH:
Statement about Ezzo - Materials

GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH:
Statement about Ezzo - Character

CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE:
"The Cultic Characteristics of Growing Families International"
(originally titled "More than a Parenting Ministry")

CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE:
"GFI"
(orginally titled "A Matter of Bias?")

CHRISTIANITY TODAY:
Unprepared to Teach Parenting?

CHRISTIANITY TODAY:
Babywise Publisher Plans Contract Cancellation

AMERICAN ACADEMY of PEDIATRICS:
Media Alert